
“The cost of stopping energy imports would be significant, considering that the coronavirus pandemic cost about 4.5 percent of economic output,” says Andreas Peichl, EconPol network member and Director of the ifo Center for Macroeconomics and Surveys.
Major economic slumps and upheaval cannot be ruled out either, as the strength of the potential shock injects a high degree of uncertainty into the simulation. Peichl added that large parts of industry have not yet recovered from the effects of the pandemic, and that must also be taken into account. Moreover, it is not clear from the simulated decline in overall gross domestic product that some branches of industry, as well as upstream and downstream sectors, may be much more severely affected.
Replacing Russian gas imports is complicated, the study states. Gas could be imported from countries other than Russia, coal and nuclear energy could be used instead of gas in power generation, and gas reserves could be replenished over the summer. However, these measures would only partially offset the deficit in gas consumption over the next 12 months.
First and foremost, policies should aim to increase incentives for substituting and conserving fossil fuels as quickly as possible, even if an embargo is not imminent.
“Taking action now means we don’t have to make even tougher adjustments this year or next when push comes to shove. Since such a move would drive prices up even further, targeted support measures would have to be taken for industries and social groups that have been especially hard-hit,” Pittel says.
Read more HERE
Comments
comments